Development and initial validation of the Effective Communication in Oncology Questionnaire
PDF (Español)

Keywords

Communication skills
Bad news
Oncology
Validity
Reliability

Abstract

Communication of bad news represents a frequent, unavoidable, and stressful situation in clinical settings. The manner in which bad news is communicated affects patients in different ways. Thus, it has become increasingly important to adequately assess the communication skills involved. Current instruments for measuring such skills in oncology present limited evidence of validity, they are not very accessible because they require a great deal of training and time. Such procedures are used more in teaching and training than in research. The present study aimed to develop and validate an effective communication questionnaire in oncology. A cross-sectional design was used in which oncologists and residents participated. The six-step protocol for communicating bad news (SPIKE) and the communication recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) were used to design the instrument, and the items obtained were evaluated for relevance, coherence, and clarity by a group of six experts in the field. Piloting was performed on 25 internal medicine residents, and a final application was performed on 87 oncology physicians and residents. The results show that the effective communication questionnaire presents from good to excellent content validity in each item and the whole scale showed an alpha coefficient of .97. Exploratory factor analysis yielded 30 items in three factors: basic communication skills (α = .91), discussion of goals of care and prognosis (α = .84), and empathy (α = .78), that together explain 44.4% of the variance, and show adequate internal consistency. It is concluded that the Questionnaire of Effective Communication in Oncology shows adequate psychometric properties for its use in research. Data showed the questionnaire is useful to explore the communication skills of oncologists and residents. Future studies should continue collecting evidence of the instrument’s validity by expanding the number of participants and applying it to diverse professional populations, as well as relating it to other variables.

https://doi.org/10.25009/pys.v36i1.3036
PDF (Español)

References

Arraras, J.I., Wintner, L.M., Sztankay, M., Tomaszewski, K., Hofmeister, D., Costantini, A., Bredart, A., Young, T., Kuljanic, K., Tomaszewska, I.M., Kontogianni, M., Chie, W.C., Kullis, D., Greimel, E. y Zarandona, U. (2017). La comunicación entre el paciente oncológico y los profesionales. El Cuestionario de Comunicación de la EORTC. Psicooncologia, 14(1), 107-120. Doi: 10.5209/PSIC.55815

Ascencio H., L., Allende P., S., Castañeda, C. y Varástegui A., E. (2015). La comunicación de las “malas noticias” en cuidados paliativos. Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología, 12(4), 276-279.

Back, A., Fromme, E. y Meier, D. (2019). Training Clinicians with Communication Skills Needed to Match Medical Treatments to Patient Values. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(2), 435-441. Doi: 10.1111/jgs.15709

Baile, W.F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E.A. y Kudelka, A.P. (2000). SPIKES — A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. The Oncologist, 5, 302-311. Doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302

Boucher, V.G., Gemme, C., Dragomir, A.I., Bacon, S.L., Larue, F. y Lavoie, K.L. (2020). Evaluation of communication skills among physicians: A systematic review of existing assessment tools. Psychosomatic Medicine, 82(4), 440-451. Doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000794

De-Vellis, R. 2017. Scale development: Theory and Applications. (pp. 105-151). Sage.

Duffy, F.D., Gordon, G.H., Whelan, G., Cole-Kelly, K. y Frankel, R. (2004). Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: The Kalamazoo II report. Academic Medicine, 79(6), 495-507.

Farokhyar, N., Shirazi, M., Bahador, H., Baradaran, H. y Jahanshir, A. (2014). Assessing the validity and reliability of SPIKES questionnaires regard in of medical residents awareness breaking bad news in TUMS 2012. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, 21(122), 1-36.

Flores M., S. (2018). Bioética en la formación del cirujano oncológo. Recuperado de https://oncologia.mx/2018/11/05/bioetica-en-la-formacion-del-cirujano-oncologo/

Gilligan, T., Coyle, N., Frankel, R., Berry, D., Bohlke, K., Epstein, R., Finlay, E., Jackson, V., Lathan, C., Loprinzi, C., Nguyen, L., Seigel, C. y Baile, W. (2018). Patient-clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 73(2), 96-97. Doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000530053.40106.9b

Guillén L., O. y Olascoaga M., A. (2017). Habilidad de los médicos residentes para comunicar malas noticias. Revista de la Sociedad Peruana de Medicina Interna, 30(2), 78-81. Doi: 10.36393/spmi.v30i2.65

Gutiérrez L., M., de Castro E., K. y Fernández C., M.G. (2014). El proceso de comunicación en oncología: Relato de una experiencia. Psicooncología, 11(2/3), 403-418.

Hernández N., R.A. (2002). Contributions to Statistical Analysis. Caracas: Universidad de Los Andes.

Klocker-Kaiser, U. y Klocker, J. (2013). The setting, the truth, and the dimensions of communication with cancer patients. En Surbone, A., Zwitter, M., Rajer, M. y Stiefel, R. (Eds.): New challenges in communication with cancer patients. (pp. 231-234). Boston: Springer. Doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3369-9_19

Kramer, M., Düsman, H., Tan, C., Jansen, M., Grol, M. y Van der Vleuten, M. (2004). Acquisition of communication skills in postgraduate training for general practice. Medical Education, 38(2), 158-167.

Luna S., Y. (2019). How to say bad news without compromising the patient’s humanity. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 36(1), 123-127. Doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2019.361.3921

Mack, J., Fasciano, K. y Block, S. (2018). Communication about prognosis with adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: Information needs, prognostic awareness, and outcomes of disclosure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36(18), 1861-1867. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.2128

Makoul, G. (2001). Essential elements of communication in medical encounters. Academic Medicine, 76(4), 390-393.

Manna, R., Bylund, C.L., Brown, R.F., Di Ciccone, B.L. y Konopasek, L. (2017). Facilitating communication role play sessions. En Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198736134.003.0054

Mostafavian, Z. y Abbasis, Z. (2018). Evaluation of physicians’ skills in breaking bad news to cancer patients. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 7(2), 601-605. Doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc

Platas, A., Cruz R., M., Mesa C., F., Jasqui B., A., De la Rosa P., S., Rivera, F., Mohar, A. y Villarreal G., C. (2020). Communication challenges among oncologists in Mexico. Journal of Cancer Education. Doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01703-7

Radziej, K., Loechner, J., Engerer, C., Niglio, M., Freund, J., Sattel, H., Bachmann, C., Berberat, P. O., Dinkel, A. y Wuensch, A. (2017). How to assess communication skills? Development of the rating scale ComOn Check: Evaluation of communication skills. Medical Education Online, 22(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1392823

Rosenbaum, M. y Silverman, J. (2014). Training for effective communication in health settings. En L. Martins y R. Dimateo. Health communication, behavior change and treatment adherence. Oxford.

Stubenrauch, S., Schneid, E.M., Wünsch, A., Helmes, A., Bertz, H., Fritzsche, K., Wirsching, M. y Gölz, T. (2012). Development and evaluation of a checklist assessing communication skills of oncologists: The COM-ON-Checklist. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(2), 225-230. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01556.x

Téllez T., M.Y., Bernal C., I., Seáñez M., A.R. y Delgado R., M. (2023). Efectos diferenciales de un taller de entrenamiento en habilidades comunicativas para estudiantes de Medicina. Psicología y Salud, 33(1), 187-207. Doi: 10.25009/pys.v33i1.2783

 

Licencia Creative Commons

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.


Usted es libre de:

  • Compartir: copia y redistribuye el material en cualquier medio o formato
  • Adaptar: remezclar, transformar y construir sobre el material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente.

  

El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando siga los términos de licencia.

Bajo los siguientes términos:

  • Atribución — Debe dar el crédito adecuado, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se realizaron cambios. Usted puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
  • Sin restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros hacer cualquier cosa que la licencia permita.

 

Avisos:

  • Usted no tiene que cumplir con la licencia para elementos del material en el dominio público o cuando su uso está permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
  • No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le dé todos los permisos necesarios para su uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.