Predictores de tratamiento asociados a prevención de recaídas en usuarios drogodependientes: una revisión sistemática
PDF

Palabras clave

Factores relacionados con el tratamiento
Recaídas
Drogodependencias
Grupos de autoayuda Factors related to treatment
Relapses
Drug dependencies
Self-help groups

Resumen

Los factores relacionados con el tratamiento terapéutico constituyen importantes predictores asociados a la prevención de recaídas durante la recuperación de las drogodependencias. Sin embargo, aún es necesario investigar por qué algunos de los elementos propios del periodo de rehabilitación son lo suficientemente efectivos para elevar significativamente las probabilidades de remisión de los trastornos por abuso de sustancias. Por ello, el objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar la manera en que la interrelación de las variables predictoras agrupadas en el dominio del tratamiento influyen o contrarrestan el retorno al consumo de drogas en usuarios drogodependientes. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos EBSCO, Scopus y Science Direct que abarcó el período de 2011 a 2020. Después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, establecidos a partir de la estrategia PICOS, se seleccionó un total de ocho artículos, de los cuales la mayoría tenían diseños aleatorios controlados, con cifras de participantes superiores a mil usuarios, seguimientos longitudinales de más de doce meses y procedimientos estadísticos multivariados. Las principales variables predictoras identificadas fueron la calidad de los programas de autoayuda de doce pasos, el apoyo de pares, los tratamientos grupales, la atención plena, la duración del tratamiento y el tipo de servicios (ambulatorios o residenciales). Los estudios que denotaron tener una mayor consistencia destacan la importancia de la participación comprometida en grupos de autoayuda, la calidad de las actividades propuestas en los programas de doce pasos y el apoyo de pares como componentes clave para prevenir recaídas durante la recuperación de las drogodependencias.

https://doi.org/10.25009/pys.v34i1.2842
PDF

Citas

Abdullah, M., Khan, M.I., Mumtaz, F., Shah, F., Ximenes, R.C., Nikoui, V. y Wahab, A. (2020). Risk factors associated with relapse of drug dependence after treatment and rehabilitation in areas under the influence of war on terror. Advancements in Life Sciences, 7(3), 117-121.

Afkar, A., Rezvani, S.M. y Sigaroudi, A.E. (2017). Measurement of factors influencing the relapse of addiction: a factor analysis. International Journal High Risk Behaviors & Addiction, 6(3), e32141. Doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.32141

Armijo O., S., Stiles, C.R., Hagen, N.A., Biondo, P.D. y Cummings, G.G. (2012). Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: Methodological research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 12-18. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753. 2010.01516

Barkham, M., Connell, J., Stiles, W.B., Miles, J.N., Margison, F., Evans, C. y Mellor-Clark, J. (2006). Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: the good enough level. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(1), 160-167. Doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.160

Bassuk, E.L., Hanson, J., Greene, R.N., Richard, M.y Laudet, A. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 63, 1-9. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2016.01.003

Blodgett, J.C., Maisel, N.C., Fuh, I.L., Wilbourne, P.L.y Finney, J.W. (2014). How effective is continuing care for substance use disorders? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 87-97. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2013.08.022

Bobes, J., Bascarán M., T., Bobes B., M., Carballo J., L., Diaz M., E.M., Flores, G. y Saiz P., A. (2007). Valoración de la gravedad de la adicción: Aplicación al manejo clínico y seguimiento del tratamiento. Madrid: PNSD/Cibersam. Recuperado de http://www.fundacioncsz.org/ArchivosPublicaciones/214pdf

Borkman, T. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. Rutgers University Press.

Byrt, T. (1996) How good is that agreement? Epidemiology, 7(5), 561. Doi: 10.97/00001648-199609000-00030

Chie, Q.T., Tam, C.L., Bonn, G., Dang, H.M. y Khairuddin, R. (2016). Substance abuse, relapse, and treatment program evaluation in Malaysia: Perspective of rehabilitation of patients and staff using the mixed method approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 90. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00090

Coco, G.L., Melchiori, F., Oieni, V., Infurna, M.R., Strauss, B., Schwartze, D., Rosendahl, J. y Gullo, S. (2019). Group treatment for substance use disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 99, 104-116. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2019.01.016

Crits-Christoph, P., Johnson, J.E., Connolly G., M.B. y Gallop, R. (2013). Process predictors of the outcome of group drug counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(1), 23-34. Doi: 10.37/a0030101

Etheridge, R.M., Craddock, S.G., Hubbard, R.L.y Rounds-Bryant, J.L. (1999). The relationship of counseling and self-help participation to patient outcomes in DATA. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 99-12. Doi: 10.16/s0376-8716(99)00087

Faces and Voices of Recovery (Ed.) (2010). Addiction recovery peer service roles: Recovery management in health reform.Washington, DC: Author.

Finney, J.W., Hahn, A.C. y Moos, R.H. (1996). The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: The need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction, 91(12), 1773-1796. Doi: 10.46/j.1360-0443.1996.911217733.x

Fiorentine, R. y Hillhouse, M.P. (2000). Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: The additive effects of integrated recovery activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(1), 65-74. Doi: 10.16/s0740-5472(99)00020-3

Friedmann, P.D., Alexander, J.A., Jin, L.y D’Aunno, T.A. (2000). Medical and psychosocial services in outpatient drug abuse treatment: Do stronger links promote client utilization? Health Services Research, 35(2), 443-465.

García P., H.A. (2015). Fundamental concepts of systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Colombian Urology, 24(1), 28-34. Doi: 10.16/j.uroco.2015.03.005

Hansen, N.B., Lambert, M.J. y Forman, E.M. (2002). The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3), 329-343. Doi: 10.93/clipsy.9.3.329

Howard, K.I., Kopta, S.M., Krause, M.S.y Orlinsky, D.E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41(2), 159-164. Doi: 10.02/jclp.10167

Iglesias E., B., Tomás M., C., Pérez E., J.P., Hermida J., R.F., Fernández L., C., González M., P.B., Secades, R. y Gradolí V., T. (2008). Guía clínica de intervención psicológica en adicciones. Madrid: Socidrogalcohol.

Joe, G.W., Simpson, D.D. y Broome, K.M. (1999). Retention and patient engagement models for different treatment modalities in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 113-125. Doi: 10.16/s0376-8716(99)00088-5

Lenaerts, E., Matheï, C., Matthys, F., Zeeuws, D., Pas, L., Anderson, P. y Aertgeerts, B. (2014). Continuing care for patients with alcohol use disorders: a systematic review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 135, 9-21. Doi: 10.16/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.030

Li, W., Howard, M.O., Garland, E.L., McGovern, P. y Lazar, M. (2017). Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 75, 62-96. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2017.01.008

Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J. y Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1-e34. Doi: 10.16/j.jclinepi.2009.06006

Litt, M.D., Kadden, R.M., Cooney, N.L. y Kabela, E. (2003). Coping skills and treatment outcomes in cognitive-behavioral and interactional group therapy for alcoholism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 118-128. Doi: 10.37//0022-006x.71.1.118

Luengo M., M.Á., Romero T., E. y Gómez F., X.A. (2001). Análisis de la eficacia y prevención de recaídas en el consumo de drogas, análisis de la eficacia del programa terapéutico-educativo Proyecto hombre. Universidad Santiago de Compostela.

Majer, J.M., Droege, J.R. y Jason, L.A. (2010). A categorical assessment of twelve-step involvement in relation to recovery resources. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 5(2), 155-167. Doi: 10.80/1556035 1003766158

Majer, J.M., Jason, L.A., Ferrari, J.R. y Miller, S.A. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of categorical twelve-step involvement among a U.S. national sample of recovering substance abusers in residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(1), 37-44. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2012.03.001

McKellar, J., Stewart, E. y Humphreys, K. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous involvement and positive alcohol-related outcomes: Cause, consequence, or just a correlate? A prospective two-year study of 2,319 alcohol-dependent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 302-308. Doi: 10.37/0022-006X.71.2.302

Meier, P.S., Barrowclough, C. y Donmall, M.C. (2005). The role of therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: A critical review of the literature. Addiction, 100(3), 304-316. Doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00935.x

Menon, J. y Kandasamy, A. (2018). Relapse prevention. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 473-478.

Moos, R.H y Moos, B.S. (2006). Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: A 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 735-750. Doi: 10.02/jclp.20259

Moos, R.H y Moos, B.S. (2007). Protective resources and long-term recovery from alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(1), 46-54. Doi: 10.16/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.015

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (2021). Enfoques de tratamiento para la drogadicción. DrugFacts. Recuperado de https://nida.nih.gov/es/publicaciones/drugfacts/enfoques-de-tratamiento-para-la- drogadicción

Pereira E., M. (2017). Factores psicosociales relacionados con el consumo de sustancias psicoactivas en los jóvenes cartageneros atendidos por ingreso y recaídas hospitalarias en la clínica de La Misericordia (2016-2021). Tesis inédita de Licenciatura. Cartagena (Colombia): Universidad de Cartagena.

Ritsher, J.B., McKellar, J.D., Finney, J.W., Otilingam, P.G y Moos, R.H. (2002). Psychiatric comorbidity, continuing care and mutual help as predictors of five-year remission from substance use disorders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(6), 709-715. Doi: 10.15288/jsa.2002.63.709

Santos, C., Pimenta, C. y Nobre, M. (2007). PICO strategy for the construction of the research question and the search for evidence. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(3), 508-511. Doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023

Schmidt, L.K., Bojesen, A.B., Nielsen, A.S y Andersen, K. (2018). Duration of therapy: Does it matter? A systematic review and meta-regression of the duration of psychosocial treatments for alcohol use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 84, 57-67. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2017.11.002

Shin, H.C., Marsh, J.C., Cao, D. y Andrews, C.M. (2011). Client-provider relationship in comprehensive substance abuse treatment: Differences in residential and non- residential settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(4), 335-346. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2011.03.007

Sinha, R. (2011). New findings on biological factors predicting addiction relapse vulnerability. Current Psychiatry Reports, 13(5), 398-405. Doi: 10.07/s11920-011-0224-0

Sobell, L.C y Sobell, M.B. (2011). Group therapy for substance use disorders: A motivational cognitive-behavioral approach. The Guilford Press.

Thomas, B.H., Ciliska, D., Dobbins, M. y Micucci, S. (2004). A process for systematically reviewing the literature: Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 1(3), 176-184. Doi: 10.11/j.1524-475X.2004.04006.x

Tracy, K. y Wallace, S.P. (2016). Benefits of peer support groups in the treatment of addiction. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 7, 143-154. Doi:10.2147/SAR.S81535

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2018). Resumen, conclusiones y consecuencias en materia de políticas. Informe Mundial sobre las Drogas 2018. Recuperado de https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2019/prelaunch/WDR2019_B1_S.pdf

Weiss, R.D., Griffin, M.L., Gallop, R.J., Najavits, L.M., Frank, A., Crits-Christoph, P., Thasee, M., Blaine, J., Gastfriendag, D., Daley, D. y Luborsky, L. (2005). The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(2), 177-184. Doi: 10.16/j.drugalcdep.2004.08

White, W. (2009). Peer-based addiction recovery support: History, theory, practice and scientific evaluation. Philadelphia, PA: Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health & Mental Retardation Services.

Witbrodt, J., Mertens, J., Kaskutas, L.A., Bond, J., Chi, F. y Weisner, C. (2012). Do 12-step meeting attendance trajectories over 9 years predict abstinence? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43(1), 30-43. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2011.10.004

Witbrodt, J., Ye, Y., Bond, J., Chi, F., Weisner, C. y Mertens, J. (2014). Alcohol and drug treatment involvement, 12-step attendance and abstinence: 9-year cross-lagged analysis of adults in an integrated health plan. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(4), 412-419. Doi: 10.16/j.jsat.2013.10.015